The simplest rule to avoid drunken driving charges and penalties – do not drink and drive. However, this may not be possible in certain instances. Many have no clue about how little mistakes can lead to serious trouble if you face stop and arrest on DWI (driving while intoxicated) charges.
Louisiana DWI laws are very stringent about punishing drunk drivers. Therefore, getting legal advice and representation is imperative. Most are aware of this, and yet commit mistakes. Avoid these and you may be able to defend yourself against the charges.
– may hamper your case and increase problems. For a DWI charge in New Orleans, you only have 15 days to request the Department of Public Safety and Corrections for a hearing. If you do not get a lawyer to work on your case immediately, you may miss this deadline, and face license suspension.
– may cost you dearly. You do not visit a dentist for an eye infection. Similarly, you do not choose a divorce lawyer for your DWI defense. You need a lawyer specializing in the Louisiana laws to handle your case.
]]>
– may also lead to difficulties. Just knowledge about the laws would be of no use if the lawyer has no idea about the way the legal process works. Whether it is plea bargaining or creating a defense strategy for trial, experienced lawyers can handle it with efficiency.
– may lead to a wrong decision. Sometimes, a law firm may have 85% success rate, but when you probe deeper, you see that those cases did not involve any major complications, making them easier to win.
– trying to save on this may end in disaster. The cheapest is not always the best option. Do not choose a because of its cheap rates. Instead, focus on its reputation and reliability. Look for success stories, client testimonials, and such other proof of this.
Choosing competent legal aid and assistance on time can save you a lot of trouble. DWI conviction in Louisiana comes with penalties including jail term (6 months for the first offense, and more for subsequent ones), fines (,000-5,000), license suspension, substance abuse treatment, vehicle seizure and forfeiture, and so on.
Moreover, the record stays until you opt for expungement using the proper procedure.
On the other hand, you can opt for an explanation that there was legal justification for your act – as you felt dizzy and had to pull out in order to avoid an accident. Whatever the situation, if it was a mistake on your part, you had better seek legal help. Discuss the matter with an attorney to know what to do. Go through the lawyer directory to find a qualified traffic tickets attorney.
Allek Hall, a legal journalist, offers helpful details for legal issues concerning the drunk driving laws. If you are looking for a New Orleans DWI law firm, he suggests you to visit http://www.bloomlegal.com/
www.Lawyeryourself.net/purchasevd.php- In the case, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to afford their own attorneys. The Supreme Court had ruled in Powell v. Alabama, 287 US 45 (1932), the famous case of the Scottsboro Boys, that the right to counsel was implied in the Bill of Rights and was an essential freedom. In Betts v. Brady, 316 US 455 (1942), the Court had modified this doctrine slightly, ruling that whether or not a lawyer was required depended on the circumstances of each case. Specifically, the Court focused on a case-by-case determination if the lack of representation affected a denial of due process, thus rendering the trial unfair. Over the next twenty years, the Court heard several more cases and in all of them ruled that, in fact, a lawyer was required. Due to the difficulty of proving the high standard of a due process error, nearly all such cases involved the death penalty. This view had not changed by the early 1960s. Gideon v. Wainwright was one of a series of Supreme Court decisions which confirmed the right of defendants in criminal proceedings to counsel during trial, on appeal, and in the subsequent cases of Massiah v. United States, 377 US 201 (1964) and Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 (1966), even during police interrogation. Quoted from en.wikipedia.org
Video Rating: 5 / 5
Find More Legal Help Articles